false
Catalog
2023 World Conference on Lung Cancer (Posters)
EP17.03. Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Brigatinib V ...
EP17.03. Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in Chinese Patients with ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer - PDF(Abstract)
Back to course
Pdf Summary
This study examined the pharmacoeconomic analysis of brigatinib versus alectinib in Chinese patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Alectinib and brigatinib are both ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat advanced NSCLC in China. The researchers used a partition survival model to simulate health outcomes and costs over a 30-year period. The clinical efficacy and safety data were based on the ALTA-1L trial for brigatinib and the ALEX trial for alectinib. Since there were no head-to-head trials comparing the two drugs, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to obtain comparative efficacy. The study conducted a cost-minimization analysis and found that brigatinib was cost-saving compared to alectinib. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis showed that brigatinib gained incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and was less costly than alectinib. Sensitivity analyses revealed that drug costs were the most influential factor. Thus, the authors concluded that brigatinib is cost-saving and economically dominant compared to alectinib for the treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC in China.
Asset Subtitle
Congling Gu
Meta Tag
Speaker
Congling Gu
Topic
Global Health, Health Services & Health Economics: Health Economics
Keywords
pharmacoeconomic analysis
brigatinib
alectinib
ALK-positive NSCLC
partition survival model
cost-minimization analysis
cost-saving
QALYs
sensitivity analyses
China
×
Please select your language
1
English