false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
How to Read and Write Conference Abstracts
How to Read and Write Conference Abstracts
How to Read and Write Conference Abstracts
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
This webinar, part of IASLC STARS training for patient research advocates (PRAs), explained how to read, write, and review scientific conference abstracts. Speakers described why abstracts matter: they provide a short, standalone summary of research for journals, conferences, and grant applications. For conferences, abstracts act as applications for presentation and are used to decide whether work is suited for a poster, oral talk, or other format.<br /><br />The presenters outlined the standard abstract structure: introduction/background, methods, results, and conclusion. They emphasized critical reading: assess whether the study fits a clear question, whether the methods are sound, whether the results are meaningful, and whether the conclusion is supported by the data. Attendees were encouraged to consider the level of evidence and to be cautious about overclaiming.<br /><br />A major theme was the value PRAs bring to abstract writing. Their lived experience is evidence and helps connect science to patient reality. The presenters advised using clear, authentic language, avoiding AI tools like ChatGPT, and focusing on the patient impact and “so what” of the research. Examples showed how stronger abstracts name the population, state the unmet need, and make a direct call to action.<br /><br />The review section explained how conference abstract review works, including call-for-abstracts guidance, scoring criteria, anonymized review, and committee decisions. PRAs were encouraged to focus on relevance, clarity, patient impact, and patient involvement rather than getting lost in technical details.<br /><br />The Q&A addressed differences between conference and grant abstracts, choosing tracks, using keywords, and how PRAs can develop research ideas into abstracts through collaboration with researchers and other experts.
Meta Tag
Concept
Scientific Conference Abstract
Concept
Conference Abstract Writing
Concept
Abstract Review
Concept
Abstract Structure
Concept
Patient Research Advocate
Keywords
scientific conference abstracts
IASLC STARS training
patient research advocates
abstract writing
abstract review
conference submission
research summary
patient impact
methods results conclusion
anonymized review
Scientific Conference Abstract
Conference Abstract Writing
Abstract Review
Abstract Structure
Patient Research Advocate
×
Please select your language
1
English